view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Really unfortunate as it had nothing to with Sheeran's team. It was the stadium owner that blocked Macklemore.
Ed Sheeran chose to be a spineless weiner and cave to the billionaires. He had enough power to push back and chose not to.
Or, if he wanted to stay in business as a well-remunerated organ-grinder’s monkey, an apolitical entertainer who guarantees a good show to anyone who likes his songs regardless of politics, he should have vetted his supports better, as you can’t have it both ways.
I do believe the mistake is with the billionaire stadium owner. He had an opportunity to sit down with Macklemore and discuss the issue, but chose not to. That is something I think is lacking in todays world, and talking first will almost always lead to better outcomes.
The guy is a personal friend of Bibi Netanyahu. He's not interested in talking, he's interested in covering up for Israel because he is a Zionist. He literally runs a surveilance center inside the Patriots stadium where they track "anti-semetic hate speech" online. Which includes things like "Free Palestine" and criticism of Zionism.
There's no discussion to be had. Nothing Macklemore said was hate speech, or should even be considered controversial. He advocated for people who need help. He even said none of it was an attack on Jewish people. Billionaire Zionists and their powerful friends realized it was effectively spreading a message they wanted to suppress, and now here we are.
I've never thought that not talking was the better option than talking. I would suppose then you don't associate with anyone you disagree with.
I mean not particularly when the disagreement is about wether or not a genocide is bad. At a certain point, there are fundamental differences that are irreconcilable.
War is always bad. I'm still at a loss why Hamas doesn't just stop.
When Israel gave Gaza to the Palestinians it was a prosperous land. Hamas did nothing but build tunnels and missiles with the sole purpose but to destroy Israel.
Another situation where talking might improve things.
Some truth to that perhaps, but Sheeran is worth some $400,000 million. He could easily told those stadiums that if they feel the need to cancel the shows over Macklemore's statements they could do so. They would have to refund all those tickets to people. Sheeran could then just change the tour to other, smaller venues. Or even arrange free concerts in the affected towns. Instead, he bowed to those billionaire stadium owners and tried to dance around saying it wasn't his fault. Bad choice and not one I'd have made if I had his resources.
As I said earlier, I believe the fault lies with the stadium owner when he chose to not have a discussion with Macklemore. I have no idea what kind of contract Sheeran had with the owner, so it's really hard for me to speculate what Sheeran should or shouldn't have done. Easy enough to judge when we are all outsiders.
Beatles and Green Day managed it without a fraction of Sheeran's wealth and power. Capitulating was Sheeran's choice.
I honestly have no way to compare the situations.