33
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] infeeeee@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

It's disclosed in the readme, so at least they are not hiding it:

This project was developed with significant assistance from AI tools. I mean, you can still blame me (Seth) for bugs, but I just wanted to mention it.

Note: All included textures/materials are real images taken by humans, not AI generated

[-] helix@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I still think it's disingenuous. Because this is not significant assistance by an LLM, but rather the human did some assistance where the LLM coded everything.

You can't even read and understand 10kLOC a day. I have worked as a DevOps engineer where one of my responsibilities was ensuring code quality and I could review maybe 100-1000LOC a day but the days where I read more than about 300 I noticed a significant rise in errors slipping through, and it physically and mentally exhausted me.

I read somewhere professional software devs usually write 17LOC per day on average, while deleting 40-50 and adding 60-70, while reading about 200-300. That's still a few multiples away from the 11kLOC/d (every day! Including weekends!) in this example.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I'm sorry but it doesn't matter one single iota to me who discloses it. The mere fact is what turns me off.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
33 points (78.9% liked)

Open Source

49130 readers
867 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS