"Proposed KDE LLM guidelines" is now officially locked (invent.kde.org)

submitted 1 day ago by Kiriko@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some of the worst LLM takes I've seen in a while. I've never thought FLOSS would be taken over by proprietary torment nexuses so fast.

The discussion will probably continue behind closed doors, so the public has no way of knowing who says what and corporations have their way easier.

And someone got exposed for being a Nazi.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] rhamph@awful.systems 19 points 16 hours ago

I don’t get the fuss here. The KDE LLM policy is essentially the same as the Linux kernel.

Psssst! Slop in the kernel is also bad

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world -5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Have you seen the quality of the code in the kernel? I am no c fan but the bar and standards are incredibly high.

The kernel is certainly LLM assisted but I don’t think any honest dev can look at say the recent LLM assisted code and call it slop. If anything the quality of Linux code has gotten higher over the past decade.

I am not a fan of vibe coded slop and I don’t think it’s fair to call the kernel slop.

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 11 hours ago

hogher

Bristley? Invasive? Dangerous? Not kosher?

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Typo fixed. I mean better.

[-] flowerysong@awful.systems 5 points 11 hours ago

Fuck off, no one asked you for your bad opinions.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 11 hours ago

it’s slop

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026

34 points (90.5% liked)

TechTakes

2699 readers

218 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems