182
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
182 points (90.6% liked)
Open Source
49140 readers
1291 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes and no. As an author of open source projects, they were made available for people to fork, improve and conrribute under permissive licenses. Then come LLMs that uses code like mine to generate code or slop. My choice about license was made before LLMs. Now they use derivatives of my work without attribution as required by the license.
Even if I change the license, it won't be respected, and nothing else will change. To me, that's copyright infringement on me, ignoring the hours I put in.
On a separate note, LLMs only produce more of the same, ignoring the environmental and economic impacts. Often, more of the same is not what we need. It leads to the same mistakes being made. I've never used LLM to code, never will.
as a pirate, i shit on copyright, culture should be free. the issue with llm is not that they used copyrighted shit, if the llm would be open source and not owned by a corpo, i'd be contributing to knowledge. here, you're just contributing to some gringo westoid billionaire's pockets. everything is a remix, i dont have an issue with that. so again, the issue is labour theft in marxists terms.