view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Am German, your guess is correct. As soon as anything goes it that direction it's all blamed as antisemitism and you should know your Erbschuld.
Basically, as Merz said, we're fully supporting Israel. And that's also one of the things causing more and more issues and gap between politics and reality here.
For the record, as a German I do remember the lessons we learned from our grisly past: That genocide is evil and that it's very easy for a country to sink into utter barbarism. I wish we could take the principled stand we owe to our past victims and condemn Israel for its actions.
Unfortunately, that's just what the German people learned. German politicians apparently learned from our past that our mistake was to genocide the wrong people and to lose the war.
From the outside it really feels like the German elites, including its political class, might have been forced by outsiders to hide their swastikas and stop loudly shouting certain slogans, but their hearts remained in the same place and their "values" the same.
"We made a mistake and this race were not untermenschem but rather ubermeschen like us" is a lot easier to accept than it is to turn ones entire morality upside down and accept that people and the way they should be treated is not determied by race and thus they personally (as "Arians") are not inherently superior.
Certainly this explains why the "making amends" after WWII and the Holocaust was an almost entirelly racialized thing rather than being about the actual victims and how that should never be done to anybody (the race-agnostice people-centric Humanist view) and why not all ethnic groups with large numbers of victims in the Holocaust got the same treatment (specifically the Romani - over 250000 of whom were murdered in the Holocaust and who were targetted for extermination - don't get anywhere the same treatment as the Jewish People).
In light of their reaction to the Israeli Genocide in Gaza, the heavy stink of Racism from the German elites is becoming very clear and its roots in History seem obvious.
Tja nun.
Supporting Israel is making the same mistake twice.
To make it a little more nuanced let's say that supporting genocide is doing it again.
The whole supporting of a nation because of the race of its people is the morality of Racists and Supremacists.
You could say that's the original sin in what Germany is doing now.
From that moral posture of one's race justifying unwavering support no matter how horrible one's actas to ending up supporting genocide as long as a "good" race is doing it to a "bad" race, is a much smaller step, especially in Germany where there's a lot of practice in doing exactly that.
HR has asked you to find the differences in these images.
Because it's really easy to get stuck on one event, and then consider it "over" and not learn anything to carry over the next time.
In Germany they actually teach school children about the atrocities of WW2 exactly to try to prevent them from happening again.
So they don't just consider them "over", very far from it!
Oh I know what they teach, but clearly there's quite a few who seem to have learned the wrong lesson.
äh sag mal wo sind denn die Einsatzgruppen und Vernichtungslager "again"?
Mensch hier direkt die erbschuldkeule aus dem nazivokabular ausgepackt
Willst du damit sagen dass in bawü mindestens 3 Jahre lang alle Schüler von nazis unterrichtet wurden?
Das haben wir so ein gehämmert bekommen.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erbs%C3%BCnde
Außerdem deutlich älter als Nazis vom Begriff her.
das ist evident, denn auf eurer seite der Labe konnten die allermeisten Lehrer nach reichsende ja weiter unterrichten.
dann ist es auch so, daß wir hier in der norddeutschen tiefebene, bei den leuten im ländle wirklich nicht über irrationalität überrascht sind. siehe die hohe Antroposophen- und Evangelikalen-dichte bspw.
aber was ist euch denn da so herzlich pädagogisch nun "eingehämmert" worden? erst benutzt du die (im kontext der Shoah) nazivokabel (wenn du es strikt willst: post-nationalsozialistische vokabel im diskurs des sekundären antisemitismus) "Erbschuld", nun verlinkst du nen artikel zu einer theologischen kategorie.
(soll ich auch ein paar begriffe, die semantische verschiebungen erfahren haben, aufzählen?)
Wir sind da in zwei völlig verschiedene Richtungen abgebogen und nichts wäre mir ferner als nazi zu sein; im Gegenteil bin ich eher links orientiert.
Bezüglich des Begriffs habe ich mich mit informiert und tatsächlich scheint da ein Wandel gewesen zu sein. Heute ist der Begriff quasi mit anderer Verwendung und Kontext als noch vor 30 Jahren.
Ja, wir haben in der Schule mindestens 3 Jahre vorgeworfen bekommen wie wir böse nazis waren und was unsere, ja, Erbschuld ist die und zu Lasten läge. Dazu muss man sagen da ist man im Teenie Alter und bekommt Schuld für etwas zugesprochen zu einer Zeit als man noch nicht einmal lebte.
Dazu kommt, dass eventuell die Großeltern beteiligt waren - oder auch nicht, ein Teil von meinen musste unbeteiligt zum beispiel fliehen.
Didaktisch habe ich noch nie davon gehalten. Denn wenn man das Thema so angeht erzieht man sich vielleicht gleich die nächste Generation die aus Protest einfach mal dagegen läuft.
Zurück zu Punkt, eine nazi Vokabel ist es imo nicht. Belege bitte, ich bin immer gerne bereit dazu zu lernen und da ich eben nicht in solchen Kreisen bin kann es sein dass ich da was verpasst habe, insofern geht mein Begriff und die damalige Verwendung tatsächlich auf genau die verlinkte Wort Nutzung zurück.
Machen wir es kurz: