328
submitted 1 week ago by TRAHR@quokk.au to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who is also the current Democratic Senate candidate for Ohio, found himself in hot water in a past campaign over his response to anti-trans attacks from Republicans, and now he appears to be taking a different approach. 

Instead of trying to defend or explain his views on trans rights, Brown released an ad last week slamming Republicans for focusing on trans people at all, when there are so many bigger challenges facing the state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Sorry I simply will not vote for someone who supports genocide that's utterly insane.

Won't do it for president and sure as shit won't do it for a senator.

Some lines we cannot cross. I will not capitulate to this liberal framing on this - you simply cannot claim to be progressive in any way if you are ok with the wanton slaughter of innocents by an illegal state with no right to exist.

[-] kboos1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not disagreeing that genocide is bad but the other guy probably supports Israel as well since they're Republican. It's your right to not vote but anyone else reading and not voting is the same as supporting the other person by allowing them to be voted in. By not picking a side, you're picking a side and giving the other side a free pass. You're basically saying that you are ok if the opposition who supports Israel gets elected because you didn't use your vote to cancel out a vote. Either way you're supporting Israel.

The choice here is to vote for a candidate that supports Israel and the rights of Americans or someone that supports Israel and opposes American rights or not vote and let someone else decide for you. You can wait for your perfect candidate while the opposition votes in theirs. It's your right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I get it, but that's not how elections under FPTP works. If you want to be single issue about this, you have to vote for a candidate aligned with your choice on this. If such a candidate doesn't exist, you have to vote for the least repugnant one.

If you don't vote, you're cosigning whatever choice everyone else makes. You not voting isn't telling anyone that they didn't get your vote, it's telling everyone that you didn't care about the outcome of that election.

[-] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Many population overthrow their dictatorship and risked being kidnapped, tortured, starved and killed but you idiots have fair elections and still making excuses to vote for murderers and terrorists

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Tell me what you learned from the 2024 presidential election.

load more comments (13 replies)

I can't help this situation in any way if I'm struggling because transphobes make it difficult for me to exist. Your pool of allies against Israel decreases because I'm too busy trying to survive.

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago

There are other ways to protect and aid LGBTQ community members that are much more effective than voting for people who will throw you under the bus at a moments notice.

There's a reason a lot of us trans people are moving to blue states. The Democrats aren't trustworthy but staying in a red state is hell. It still makes a difference so spare the bullshit. Not voting is helping Republicans more than it's helping trans people.

[-] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago

If someone is going to support genocide on Palestinians they will also support the genocide of trans people. The LGBTQ community especially cannot rely on the state to protect them and must build that within their communities (of which I am very involved locally to make happen) but I'm sure you understand this well.

Completely missed the point of what I said. There's still a massive difference between the Republicans and Democrats. This isn't about local communities. Don't both sides this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No shit. One can’t take the “lesser of two evils” approach by accepting the greatest of all evils.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
328 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS