486
James Talarico’s campaign could do lasting damage to the GOP
(www.salon.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
486 points (98.4% liked)
politics
31507 readers
2009 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I hope you're right and some day the Trans community gets all the rights they ask for. My fear is that this community will be fine with bashing every Democrat in a competitive district until all we have left is republicans. They will be glad to show you what real human rights issues look like.
dunno how many times i have to assert - I'm not in texas and told my fam there to vote for him.
but you can be disappointed and still vote for harm reduction. voting for harm reduction - in this case, paxton's anti-everything-good-silly-ass - should come with people knowing you don't agree with the candidate's positions everywhere.
stop lionizing imperfection.
I never said you were in Texas... Not sure why you keep saying that....
replying to your fears dearie. it's ok, go back to sleep. it's what you're good at.
Maybe you don't know how to read, sweety pie, but that doesn't say, or even imply that you live in Texas. You can impact the public perception of a candidate even if you don't live there.
aw, bless your heart. nobody cares about what you think.
You have a funny way of saying you're wrong. But I accept your apology.
Yet again, your interpretation of reality is hilariously incorrect and you've derived the dumbest conclusion.
You are consistently stupid, which I guess is something to be proud of.
And yet, you were wrong about what I said multiple times, and when I call you out, your response is
This is sociopath type behavior. We can disagree on opinions, but when you respond to being factually wrong like this, it's clear you got problems.
Oh now you're a psychotherapist? wow....
your opinions are garbage. gonna block you now so I never have to hear another
Not if I block you first