676
submitted 3 days ago by schwim@piefed.zip to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

Hi there everyone,

Let me start this by saying that this is an honest question. I figure nobody would be better suited to answer my question than a group laser-focused on the negatives of the technology.

I see these types of memes a lot and see statistics of gallons consumed in a lot of articles I read. What I don't understand though is where the water goes that it can't be reclaimed or naturally return from a gas to a liquid.

As a kid(long ago), I was taught of the cycle of rain and the conversion between gases and liquid. It's my understanding that when a liquid is used to cool something, it also follows the same conversion process as it cools.

Could someone explain to me what's going on in this process where the 264 billion gallons of water used in the meme do not return to a liquid state?

I would appreciate any insight into the process that seems to defy this cycle that I am missing. Like I said prior, my knowledge of this process ended in middle school science class so I'm confident that I'm missing something.

Thanks for your time!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It evaporates. They could cool it back down and reuse it, but that would increase costs even more and corporations like money.

Also, "but it remains part of the water cycle" is irrelevant. Of fucking course it does; we're not talking about nuclear fusion here! But what matters isn't how much water exists, it's how much usable water exists and when it evaporates it stops being usable.

[-] kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Isn't the same true for nuclear power plants?

[-] borkborkbork@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

yes but we get value from power plants - power.

LLMs just suck up more power.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, or anything with evaporative cooling towers. (Coal-fired plants have them too, because they're associated with the steam turbine part, not the nuclear part.)

However, it should be wasting a lot less water (relative to the benefit) since the whole point is to extract as much energy from the steam as possible before it exits the turbine. Power plants have the "excuse" that if they tried to cool the steam any further they'd have to spend power to do it, which would reduce overall efficiency and thus be self-defeating.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
676 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck AI

8308 readers
1021 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS