331
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/android@lemdro.id
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lokalhorst@feddit.org 40 points 3 days ago

I don't want to spend 1000€ on a new phone. I hope they make it possible to install GrapheneOS on their budget phones as well. I am buying used Motorola phones for 150-200€ for years now, works great. In don't need to play FortNite on my mobile or whatever people do with those specs.

[-] UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip 20 points 3 days ago

The devs have confirmed that GrapheneOS will eventually work on more budget options, but initially will only be available for flagship models

[-] Zarobi@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago

I feel like in [current year] we need to get privacy phones in as many people's hands as fast as possible. It should be priority #1, not a stretch goal

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The chips do not support the features required it is as simple as that. Their eventually come to budget phones is them thinking that the features required well eventually get put into midrange chips.

It is as simple as that.

Ask Qualcolm to put those features in their midrange SOCS.

[-] Zarobi@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Personally I'm more interested in the sandboxing and non-Google features of Graphene. It kind of feels like they've decided that if everything isn't supported then it isn't worth supporting at all. But I don't see any reason why they can't have a "lite" version that I can install on my current phone. I don't want to pay so much for a new phone

[-] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

I think there are two reasons for that:

  1. they don't want to release OS with lower security than their baseline
  2. they don't want to spend effort on such "lite" OS support for many phones, and instead they choose to focus on their main builds

It should be possible to build a soft-fork of GOS for probably any device that supports e.g. LineageOS, but no one wants to do it.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe -2 points 2 days ago

I'm with you.

But it's a tough call on Graphene's part too - right now only us in-the-know have any awareness of the implications of Graphene's approach (security first) or even alternative OS for Android devices.

They probably think getting that out to the greater public is the crucial first step - get that accepted as a thing.

Also, by the time the general public is using Graphene devices, other phones may be shipping with the necessary hardware. Remember, most people are buying new phones every couple years when their old one starts misbehaving - to most people a phone is a toaster.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 14 points 3 days ago

The devs would need hardware functionality which is only found in a handful of phones all which are expensive. You are unlikely to find a cheaper device getting support.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but you’re missing out on the biggest reason to upgrade to the latest shiny new phone. You get to feel all smug and show it off to all your friends who still have last year’s phone.

/s

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago

I hope they make it possible to install GrapheneOS on their budget phones as well.

Not within Graphene's intent, alas.

Still, from the fact that this deal worked (so far...) I now expect other Custom ROMs such as lineage to reach deals with manufacturers to release the bootloader relock keys for near-EOL (or even EOL) devices that are already on the market. The way I see it, it's a win-win: the segment of people who are privacy or environmentally conscious were not going to buy a new phone from them or the competition anyway, so securing that they continue your brand gives you the option of data input to tailor next models to them, prevents ewaste from going into the environment, and keeps phones of the brand circulating in need for repairs or replacement parts which means the brand can license parts and operations.

[-] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

It is within their intent. Their problem is that there's literally no chipsets (apart from Tensors, last gen top-tier Snapdragons and Apple Silicon) that support required hardware security features. Once the chips start supporting required features, and OEMs provide access to the drivers, kernel and stuff, it should be possible to have fully functional GOS regardless of the phone price.

[-] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

If they have mte, updates, etc, they would

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
331 points (100.0% liked)

Android

22153 readers
45 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS