61

Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:36 Sponsor: TuxCare

01:46 KDE's AI policy

06:42 Existing AI policies

10:06 Going further on AI

12:58 My stance on AI

17:05 FOSS projects: yes or no to AI?

28:02 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nocteb@feddit.org -4 points 1 day ago

I think it is more important to leave people the freedom to decide for themselves. It's not an opensource project's place to tell its contributers how to work as long as the contribution fits their requirements. No one's opinion is worth more than the other one's.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

"Individual freedom" as a primary driver over the last decades/centuries is what's got the USA into the state it's in now. I'd rather focus on something that contributes to the collective good.

[-] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Telling other people what to do is also a major conflict driver.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Sure can be. But it's also a vital part of how any society works - it's what laws are for (making no claims about the efficacy of current legal systems here), and it's how you keep power in check. Libertarianism doesn't work.

[-] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

There is no law that prohibits AI use. Telling people what to do also does not work it is usually met with resistance.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

I mean laws in a general sense.. Like, you know, it's illegal to murder or whatever. That is a form of "telling people what (not) to do".

[-] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

This is about KDE and its AI policy.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
61 points (85.1% liked)

Linux

15040 readers
655 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS