1337
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bl4ckp1xx13@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

I reckon it'll be one of those things that was just ahead of it's time, I think the concept is sound, but other infrastructure to run it, energy, rare-earth mining, just isn't ready to keep up yet.

[-] Hond@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah, and dont forget the scale.

Japan is building a maglev line right now. But they have >60 years of experience with high speed rail and the whole concept is established. Even then its "only" about to be 400km to connect three major metropolian areas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C5%AB%C5%8D_Shinkansen Still:

Construction is expected to cost over ¥9 trillion Japanese yen (approximately $82 billion USD) and commenced in 2014. The start date of commercial service is unknown,[...]The Nagoya–Osaka section was planned to be completed as late as 2045, but the date was moved to as early as 2037 following a loan from the Japanese government.

Chicago to New York are more like 1200km and major stops between them are like Cleveland and Toledo. Uuuh... just build regular ass rail with a bit higher specs for higher speeds...

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

approximately $82 billion USD

We've spent over half that on the Iran war so far.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/18/us/politics/iran-war-cost-pentagon.html

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but investing in infrastructure pays out big for everyone....investing in war pays out bigger, and just for Trump and his buddies. Which would he choose?

[-] violetrage@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

? ICE 3 trains are already running 300 km/h in Germany and 320 in France. Nothing "ahead of its time"

[-] bl4ckp1xx13@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

I'm saying Maglev is ahead of it's time.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

The main issue is that you need absurd amounts of resources just to build the track alone.

[-] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You also need absurd amounts of resources to build long distance motorways.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

True, but we're talking about railway vs maglev here, and the difference here is gigantic.

Ah, yeah, got kinda lost in the thread. I thought it was about long range railway construction in general.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
1337 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

16690 readers
2031 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS