72
As Finland's Nokia is closing its research hub in China, it is back to the time when the Nokia CEO asked Europe: "Why do you use Huawei, while China has thrown us out?" (timesofindia.indiatimes.com)
submitted 5 days ago by tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org to c/europe@feddit.org
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nokia closes down its radio technology R&D center in China as European vendors are forced out of the country over China's 'national security' concerns.

...

Nokia has confirmed it is winding down its radio technology research and development centre in Hangzhou by the end of 2026, cutting roughly 1,600 jobs and quietly closing the book on a China strategy that has been unravelling for the better part of a decade. Staff were told on Thursday, August 13.

The company's explanation was clinical—it is aligning its China operations with how Nokia works globally, and its business there has been shrinking for years. Light Reading reports that Nokia sites in Beijing, Chengdu, Qingdao and Shanghai could follow, though the company hasn't confirmed that.

...

What makes the timing interesting is the argument it revives. In September 2025, at a press conference in Oulu, Finland, Nokia CEO Justin Hotard asked Europe a question it still hasn't properly answered: "Why do we allow high-risk vendors in Europe in our networks," he said, when Nokia holds under 3% share in China?

Nokia executives said at the time they had been told European vendors were to be pushed out of China on national security grounds. The Hangzhou shutdown is what that warning looks like on the ground.

...

Nokia's China revenue has more than halved since 2018 The numbers explain the exit better than any statement does. Nokia's Greater China sales fell from nearly €2.2 billion in 2018 to €913 million in 2025—a drop of more than 58%. The turn came in 2020, when Nokia lost out on key radio access network contracts with China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom. What looked like a product problem then looks structural now.

...

Danish analyst John Strand put it flatly in January: "China is lost land for vendors like Ericsson and Nokia."

...

Hotard's complaint about asymmetry hasn't aged. Huawei accounts for roughly 59% of Germany's 5G radio sites, according to Strand Consult data cited by the country's interior ministry. Only 13 of the EU's 27 member states had fully or partly adopted the bloc's 5G security toolbox as of 2025. Brussels is now moving to make it mandatory—a shift Hotard called "a very good and important step" in January. Germany wants Chinese components in RAN networks down to 25% by October 1, 2026.

...

Archived

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 11 points 5 days ago

Then Europe should simply follow in China's footsteps. It's even quite reasonable to have security concerns, especially with telecommunications.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
72 points (97.4% liked)

Europe

12075 readers
520 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
federalreverse@feddit.org
poVoq@slrpnk.net
anzo@programming.dev
EuroMod@feddit.org