72

Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:36 Sponsor: TuxCare

01:46 KDE's AI policy

06:42 Existing AI policies

10:06 Going further on AI

12:58 My stance on AI

17:05 FOSS projects: yes or no to AI?

28:02 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, yes, and that’s exactly what the KDE policy is addressing. They’re saying “we are going to reject vibecoded PRs, unconditionally; so don’t bother submitting them.”

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

The biggest contributor to the backlash of the proposed policy was the additional aspect explicitly not requiring AI used in a PR to be disclosed, regardless of its quality (and which is unrelated to the ability to quickly reject obvious slop PRs).

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

There was some discussion on that still. Some people wanted to avoid having AI companies basically get free advertisements in PRs.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Personally I thought that was a nonsensical argument from them, as they could've just put in the policy to declare that AI was used, but just not mention the specific one. Better yet, IMO, would've been to ban all non-self hosted AI use, which basically cuts out all the corporate AI's.

Though even with the self hosted models available, the ethical and copyright risk remains, so I'd still have personally opted for a total ban.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
72 points (85.3% liked)

Linux

15042 readers
522 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS