57

It’s the latest instance of “misaligned” activity confirmed by the company as concerns about AI risks grow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So, here are my questions:

Kevin Mitnick spend 7 years in the slammer, including 4 years and 8 month in solitary confinement, for harmlessly hacking a few sites for the lulz.

Why is nobody from OpenAI doing time?

Why is OpenAI allowed to continue to operate? They're clearly an active and grave national security threat at this point.

[-] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago

Right? Either they’re lying for market share, doing it intentionally for market share, or they’re grossly incompetent at sandboxing an instance. Either way, blame can’t be assigned to an agent. If it can, our world is headed for a very dark place. Blame should be assigned to the individual or company using the agent.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Blame should be assigned to the individual

String up individuals, if the 'company' is responsible (screw that they're legal people BS), then no-one is, and the fine is just the cost of doing nasty business.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Do like the EU, and make the fine so costly that it will significantly harm the corporation.

[-] boonhet@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 days ago

How do you propose someone "sandboxes an instance" of a tool with Internet access (without which it wouldn't be particularly useful)?

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

You can restrict which websites it is allowed to access, monitor the traffic, etc... There's tons of options here.

[-] boonhet@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago

Again, reducing the usefulness of a general purpose agent that can do anything for you. Plus if OpenAI starts a whitelist of allowed domains Codex can access, y'all will be up in arms too and immediately there will be a fork to remove the whitelist.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

This is about OpenAI testing new, unreleased agents in their own sandbox on specified tasks. Not about the model that gets released to the public.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Might as well let them access the nuclear codes, wouldn't want to reduce their usefulness!

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At least during the huggingface attacks, the agent sandbox was never intended to have internet access. Openai and independent researchers said the tool broke through that restriction.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mitnick made a phone call and ~~idiots~~ overworked employees gave him system access. OpenAI is much worse.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
57 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

8313 readers
1555 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS