139
submitted 6 days ago by TRAHR@quokk.au to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trans journalist Erin Reed has published a list of Democratic midterm candidates with anti-trans records, and the question she is forcing is one the party would rather not answer: if trans voters keep rewarding Democrats who harm them, what signal does that send? The calculation is real, the stakes are high, and there is no clean answer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

Vote for the pro-trans Republican instead, obviously! /S

The time to oppose anti-trans Democrats is the primary. In the general election, it's too late: at that point your choice is an anti-trans Democrat or an anti-trans and otherwise fascist Republican.

[-] TRAHR@quokk.au 23 points 6 days ago

Many of these Democrats such as Talarico waited until after the primary to start their anti-trans rhetoric. We would have already voted them out if they didn’t deceive us.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The only question that's valid to have about Talerico on this topic is "is Ken Paxton better, or is he even worse?" The answer is, "no, Ken Paxton is even worse." If Talerico doesn't win, Paxton WILL. End of.

For trans Texans, not voting for Talerico in order to keep Paxton out of office is objectively idiotic -- it's basically suicide by spite. That's just reality, and reality doesn't give a fuck if you like it or not.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago
[-] logi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

You can replace any number of subjects for trans and the argument always holds. It's a shitty situation but it's an unavoidable consequence of first-past-the-post voting.

[-] starik@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

Talarico isn’t going to push for anti-trans legislation the way Rupublicans will.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

And what on Earth makes you conclude that? He's already slid to the right on trans issues, what's to stop him from decaying further? Every other politician that starts on transphobia ends up sliding into the deep end of it. Why should he be any different?

[-] cattywampas@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

And furthermore, politics is about building coalitions. No two candidates will ever agree on everything, and no candidate will ever represent every single one of your interests. You have to pick the best choice for you out of what you've got. If you think a Republican will represent your interests as a trans person more than a Democrat, then go for it.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

You really misunderstand coalitions. The whole point of a coalition is that a bunch of minority groups will get together and say, "I'll support your issues if you support my issues." The minute the rest turn against one member group of that coalition, they're no longer part of that coalition.

You're asking trans people to support a party that is actively seeking to throw trans people out of the party. According to transphobe democratics, trans people simply are not part of the Democratic coalition.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I agree with you! To quote myself from another, now deleted thread:

You gotta get the pro-trans candidate in the primary. If you wait to look up if your candidates are anti-trans until right before the general then you waited too fucking long.

Waiting until after the primary to realize that both candidates are anti-trans is like waiting until your house is already on fire to consider if you should buy fire extinguishers. Voting for the shitty Democrat is painful but letting the even shittier Republican who also hates immigrants too win is like adding gas so that your neighbor's house will burn too.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

Talarico changed his position after the primary.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Talarico wasn't properly vetted before the primary.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

How convenient. There's always an excuse. Anything to avoid the conclusion that sometimes you need to be willing to vote against traitors in the general.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Last time you posted for that you got clowned on so hard that you deleted your whole post.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

"Mod deletes article."

Mouth-breathing liberal: "you ran away like a coward!"

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Credit where credit is due, I went through your moderation history and you are correct and I apologize. Furthermore I think a bunch of the other stuff that got deleted is actually pretty cool too. I really wish you would stop effectively suppressing trans and progressive votes. I know your heart is in the right place (and same for TRAHR, the OP) but at the end of the day when fascists disenfranchise trans people (gerrymandering, ID troubles, mail in suppression, etc.) and when you tell trans people not to vote the result is still the same: trans people have less of a voice and worse fascists getting more power with less pushback.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
139 points (87.2% liked)

politics

31261 readers
2466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS