147
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
147 points (100.0% liked)
You Should Know
47671 readers
133 users here now
YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.
All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.
Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason WHY YSK:
In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Rule 11- Posts must actually be true:
Disinformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.
Rule 12- Linking directly to a video as a source is not acceptable.
Video only posts are responsible for an outsized portion of rules violations. Your post must contain text and meet the requirements of the previous rules.
Rule 13- If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.
Partnered Communities:
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
Credits
Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1: isn't mandatory to be a mod.
2: in a visible way 3: not mandatory so long as the community is running smoothly without spam, trolls or other bad actors.
4: those communities have been purring along without causing problems the entire time; at least debian has, I don't frequent the others
Look, I'm not saying that having an active mod isn't useful; it is. I'm saying that you can't tell when a mod is active just by their post and comment history. Admins of an instance can, but we can't.
Just being real here, the fediverse is mostly bush league still. We don't get the massive spammers and trolls the way other places do. Nor is it a bad thing that communities flow organically rather than being artificially packed by a mod. Hell, there's been communities where the owner did exactly what you're talking about, and now people have them blocked because it gets old fast. Artificial engagement is artificial.
I'll also say that if you aren't motivated to post to a community that doesn't have a mod/owner posting from an account on that instance, as a mod/owner, that's a you thing. The only time a community is abandoned is when the community abandons it, not the mods. What matters in terms of there being a point to posting is the other users, the other members. Now, it definitely can happen that an absentee mod can turn into a disengaged community. Absolutely can happen. But I just don't see it very often.
Mind you, I've only been a daily or near daily fediverse user since the reddit API debacle. Before that, it was pretty much an afterthought for me. But in those few years, I've only rarely seen where a mod being an active poster made a difference a handful of times. History memes being a prime example.
I'm not trying to shit on you, I just don't think it's the kind of problem you think it is, and pointing out that mods posting or not isn't a 1:1 correlation with them actively moderating
You can't see if someone is logging in and purely viewing things. Only someone's home instance admin can. However, you can see voting activity on somewhere like lemvotes.org. If someone hasn't voted on anything in two years, say, I'd give pretty decent odds that the account probably isn't active.
That's not an absolute guarantee that a user is gone. Maybe someone uses an alternate account for all their activity, and one account just for modding. Or maybe they are just a really hardcore lurker, who doesn't ever post, comment, or vote.
But I'd generally operate on the assumption that for most users, if they aren't posting, commenting, or voting for extended periods of time, that their account is probably inactive.
EDIT: It might be interesting for Threadiverse instances to expose this publicly. Like, if an account hasn't been logged into for over a year, publicly flag it "inactive". Maybe randomize the time delay a bit so that bots can't scrape it to figure out exactly when someone last logged in. Not sure if there's any way that that that could be exploited, but it might leak a little information, and I don't think that for the purposes of determining whether someone is still around, an exact time of last login is required.
I was actually thinking the same.. We really do need a "Last Logged in"
It is not a me thing.. I was actually trying to make fedora busier, and I noticed this after.. Same as redhat. I only thought about checking after. And, I started to investigate a bit more and noticed a trend.
In the case of all 3 now, I'm trying to find secondary mods, and going to speak to people who actively contribute if they want to become mods
In 2 of the communities I saw, the mod had 12 posts, and one was asking for info on self-promotion. That being said, it's reasonable that Lemmy World admins will check if the person is doing work behind the scenes anyway.
If you're setting up 30 communities, haven't posted to 29 of them, and have only posted 12 comments TOTAL in 3 years, one of which were in those communities, you're cybersquatting ie, shrodingers moderator (since there is nothing to moderate, you're technically not a mod yet anyway)