176
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
176 points (98.9% liked)
PC Gaming
15532 readers
1005 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I was actually slightly wrong in my original comment. I'll fix it.
It's not the terms and conditions, but US law (I'm assuming he's from the US).
15 U.S.C. Chapter 50 §2301(10) defines a warranty "remedy" as...
It goes on to define a refund as...
As I recall, these other companies were either offering but not mandating a refund, which is legal, or claiming they didn't have equivalent products in stock, which allows them to unilaterally opt for a refund of the original purchase price instead.
This is a perfectly acceptable policy in a sane world, but it's 2026. Party to the bottom! Wooo.