387
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] coyootje@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was visiting my American in-laws a few weeks ago and this type of thing infuriated me. They are basically hardcore Republicans who voted for Trump 3 times but don't want to openly say it or, in the case of my mother and father in law, they keep acting like they don't vote because "it doesn't matter anyway".

They then proceed to keep complaining about gas prices, grocery prices and general cost of living. My mother in law looked at the gas price and said "jeez, I wonder why gas is so expensive". They are straight up the most ignorant people I've ever seen and they fit every single stereotype I have in my mind about rural voters.

And whenever I try to explain to them what the cause of all this is they just tell me that it has always been bad and that they won't vote.

It's one thing if you fuck yourself and your own country over (we have those voters here too in the Netherlands) but when you choose to elect someone (either by voting for them or not voting for the alternative) who has proven to be a disaster for both your country and the world as a whole it's honestly on you and you deserve everything that comes your way, including the hate you get from people in other countries.

Edit: I forgot to add that they live in Michigan so they are even part of a crucial swing state, to make things more annoying. I tried talking to them about Abdul Al-Sayed and they didn't even know who I was talking about.

[-] mig@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

If you look at effective voter manipulation strategies ie the cambridge analytica scandal, they object is not to rationally or irrationally persuade voters to change sides. The object is to sucessfully discourage the "other" side from voting. Making it seem pointless, "both sides are bad" and so on.

Your in-laws not voting is probably the best possible outcome. If they voted for Trump repeatedly they're not going to magically develop respect for the life, liberty, and happiness of others.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That poster's in-laws sound like they are just playing the usual games Republicans do when they don't want to get blamed for their beliefs and their actions.

Someone did a great video a while back about the N number of things that Republicans say that are tells. I cannot find it right now, but it clicks in with this so very much.

ETA: found it. This guy did multiple parts to this, all so very fucking true:

How to spot a maga in the wild

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XosVL0oyWuQ

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
387 points (99.5% liked)

News

39375 readers
3116 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS