36
Cops Can Bypass iPhone's Automatic Reboot to Get into Locked Phones
(www.404media.co)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)
Hacker News
5475 readers
393 users here now
Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.
The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That means that they believe there's more value in having those exploits, not necessarily that they're harder to find. Though I imagine it's at least a little bit harder because iPhones are closed source. That does also mean that if Apple doesn't discover the vulnerability, it's unlikely to get a patch. With Android, these security issues are found more easily, but also patched much faster. Which I suppose makes an Android vulnerability also worth less, since you get more limited use out of it.
Is that true though? I do a lot of security work and iOS RCE vulns are typically patched same day with all devices in support getting that security patch at the same time.
Android, it’s heavily dependant on the device manufacturer etc, no? So many forks of Android plus countless handsets never get an update as they’re out of support.
And even from an OS architecture point of view, actual Android and its IPC via intents, content providers, broadcast receivers, and component exports etc is a whole world of juicy attack surface that simply doesn’t exist on iOS. Which is a primary reason people hate iOS given apps feel so isolated and you have to use the share sheet to get data between apps.
Then you have Android’s differing chipsets vs iOS’s Secure Enclave that’s on all supported handsets. Plus Android’s WebView has addJavascriptInterface() allowing native code execution via that API whereas Safari, as shit as it is, doesn’t have that enabled.
Don’t get me wrong, Android is an awesome operating system and it’s openness enables some amazing distributions like GrapheneOS.
But even a cursory glance at the two attack surfaces, iOS has a way smaller surface and swifter patching.
The ones you know about, yes :). We know there are complete firms actively exploiting iOS devices though. With Android the security community can figure out what the flaws are and patch them, with iOS it's a black box.
Most devices are legally required to get X years of security updates, and most manufacturers do push those out fairly quickly. Maybe not all the same day, sure, but they do go out.
I do remember a fair few exploits for iOS devices that allowed an attacker to take over a device without any user interaction, and most mentioned they were actively being exploited by malicious (state) actors.
All I think however is that the price of the exploit doesn't necessarily correspond with how secure the device actually is, but rather it's based on the value that that exploit might hold. US entities would probably also offer more than EU entities, whereas for Android it might be the other way around.