390
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by martti@suppo.fi to c/news@lemmy.world

There is a leaked document of the proposal related to EU KIDS Act , which proposes requiring age verification for all online games. Also note that this proposal is not anywhere near to pass. But it exists and is going to be dicussed

Stop Killing the Internet initiative

If you're EU citizen sign this petition: https://eci.ec.europa.eu/066/public/

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQRcK9nYg9g

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Your scenario is like 10-20 years out of date.

Actual scenario: You are a kid with a phone or computer, you download one of the literally thousands of wildly popular free to play games on your device like Fortnite, and you begin playing immediately.

With F2P there is no payment barrier, which is why this sort of thing is coming up now. The constituency asking for it is parents who are having a difficult time telling their kid that they can’t be playing the popular thing that all their friends are playing.

Whether you agree with this approach or not is a separate issue, I’m not saying this is a good thing or well thought out. But the scenario and motivation are clear. The various industry rating systems worked when that was the only way to release a game, not so much when the most popular and high budget games are free.

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

The constituency asking for it is parents who are having a difficult time telling their kid that they can’t be playing the popular thing that all their friends are playing.

Bullshit, the constituency asking for this is the tech sector, probably primarily advertisers, and governments wanting to keep tabs on their citizens.

[-] shinratdr@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Two things:

  1. This is the EU, not the US. The forces you’re talking about don’t have nearly as much power there, American tech companies hate EU regulation and if they had as much power there as you presume, they would have killed DMA or GDPR first.

  2. You might try actually talking to a parent trying to raise kids in this day and age before dismissing my comment out of hand. I assure you the demographic I’m talking about absolutely does exist.

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm sure the parents exist, but my point is that they aren't the driving force. There's no way this age verification stuff starts popping up all over the world at about the same time with all these governments seriously considering it at the behest of parents. The parents aren't coordinated enough to drive international change like that, and it's not a high enough priority for them to all independently and coincidentally push for it, not to the level seen around the world. The only things that universally move governments like that are moneyed interests and power, and while I'll admit I may be wrong about the exact forces driving it, I don't see much chance at all this is organically driven by parents.

[-] IamMoonPie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I second the call of “bullshit”. As a parent of a teenager the last thing I fucking want is some pedo billionaire asking for my kids ID.

There are so many things wrong with that. Soooooo many things.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
390 points (99.7% liked)

News

39433 readers
1655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS