170
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

this motion insists on a one state solution.

Why?

Because a single state that doesn't discriminate based on religion and ethnicity IS the only solution that could possibly create lasting peace and justice.

As long as there's a Jewish supremacist apartheid ethnostate on or next to their land, no Palestinian will be safe.

Being a single ethnostate with several ethnicities being oppressed by the dominant one obviously doesn't help

Fixed it for you. Like South Africa before it, the solution is to overthrow the tyrannical apartheid system of government, not portioning out a tiny parcel of land next to it that the overlords will always scapegoat and vilify.

So what is the benefit? Why is it insisting on this?

See above.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
170 points (98.3% liked)

UK Politics

5696 readers
148 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS