114
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com to c/linux@programming.dev

The graph is on a logarithmic scale btw

Configuration Before series (ms) With series (ms)
1 vCPU 22.3 (21.6-22.6) 0.97 (0.72-1.4)
8 vCPUs 314 (97-2542) 7.0 (5.0-98)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

To me the compression sounds like it would increase RAM (virtually speaking), without hitting performance too much. Otherwise it would use the SSD and io is generally much slower than RAM operations (and compression, decompression in memory only if its fast like this one). When I understand the benefit correctly.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah I think I understand, too. You're increasing the swapping by introducing an area in RAM that is no longer usable as regular RAM, but you're also compressing, which "increases" the available RAM, so to speak. ๐Ÿ˜… At the cost of CPU of course.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

15192 readers
202 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS