30
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
30 points (91.7% liked)
Socialism
7049 readers
20 users here now
Rules TBD.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
....but the DemSocs are not some of us. Right?
Umm Im gonna be 💯 withbyou here (and ya just ban me IDC) and Ill say I dont see Dem Socs as part of us cause I legitimately believe that for every imstance in which anarchy or communiam is established for each region there will neber bee a process of 100% democratically elected socialist and anarchist community leaders. Like I actualy mean EVERY instance of successfully achieved anarchism or socialism, or even communism, in a region will HAVE to mean a unbleivable amount of death and slaughter of both the bourgeoisie AND the proletariat. BUT of mostly the bourgeoisie, because we will have to violently take back the governmental institutions, resources, etc... which they have stolen from us.
When has this not been the case? You brougjt up Allende. Uhh had Allende made CHile a seige socialist state like Kim Jing Un did NK then Socialist Chile might still exist till today, right?
Isnt this s why siege socialosm is so fucking common ? Because the capitalists and their bribed insider pigs keep on and keep on attempting to and succeeding to sabotage the socialist projects relentlessly , it leaves the socialists with no means but to resort to violence to the bourgeoisie elements both inside and outside the region. Youu brought up how maintaining the crimes of the bourgeoisie will be difficult under a democratic socialist system and thats true cause the former legal and economic institutions that were bought out or created to protect them ....are still there! Meanwhile if you just completely vaporize all members of the bourgeoisie , all their bribed institutions, and all those who took bribes to bodyguard for them this problem of bourgeoise crimes also vaporizes , no?
You cannot be 'democratically peacefiul' with cheaters whjo rig the game , SA your loved ones , massacre your entire extended family cause 'They were TooBlack©®™ or NotRichEnough©®™, and then have the legal and economic protections to paint you like a tyrant on the international stage.
They are socialists. They may not be effective, they may not hold the values you like, but they are socialists. I dont like the fact that current socialist Burkina Faso just illegalized my people, but they are socialists. Us does not mean carbon copy.
...... they arent socialist enough . you just said that they aremt socialist enough yourself!
Whats the point of being part of a big group of people if most of them are ineffective at achieving the group's goals? Nothing is substantial unless it can substatiate notable changes. Even 9 billiin DemSocs are less substantial, less worthy of our time than EVEN 1 real commie or anarchist.
Would anyone here trade 9 billion DemSocs for 1 Vladimir Lenin? (And you all better answer that question correctly...)
No need. You are right. But you are right primarily in Ethos not Pathos.