22
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com to c/linux@programming.dev

this should be a controversial post lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Greg KH in a recent talk said even the most advanced LLM produces an incorrect result 50% of the time, I would not trust it to perform more reliably than a human even with tight boundaries.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

They will do better if you give them a patch to re-apply, so it's not going to be as bad. But the review effort is probably going to eat up the time saved applying the patch, since you can't throw a coin on the LLM having done any kind of due diligence on side-effects.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
22 points (84.4% liked)

Linux

15202 readers
266 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS