Instead of guns, why not regulate ammo? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 5 days ago by pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So yeah you can fire a bullet so many different ways, a rusty nail and hammer will do the trick. Isn't the real problem the frickin bullet?

I swear in Sweden or something, you can take a gun home but ammo is only sold and consumed at the range and not for taking home.

Sure, you can make this a hollistic approach regulating guns and ammo, but the ammo seems to be the bigger issue here. You can make guns easy peasy, but ammo is much harder to manufacture and easier to regulate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] wet_bones@lemmy.4d2.org 31 points 5 days ago

Unironically, Chris Rock said exactly this in his 1999 comedy special "Bigger and Blacker".

Bullet Control

[-] Krelis_@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Exactly the thing I was reminded of

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026

43 points (82.1% liked)

Asklemmy

55818 readers

794 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS