84
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
84 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
7397 readers
252 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There are no good guys in this story, are there?
He's made mistakes, but the other side is literally Nazis.
thats usually how the world works if you look hard enough
Bad guy seems to be Bolsonaro and Meta. Why would Lula be included in that?
Bolsonaro is a corrupt conman 10 times worse not only for Brazil but for the entire world, but Lula is also a pos who is out of touch with reality. Brazil has one of the worst wealth gaps of the entire world while it's supposed to be a democrasy. All he does is telling them to work harder out of his mansion while befriending other corrupt politicians. he sucks dick and should disappear to maybe let another leader get in charge, but for now under Bolsonaro the lights will get dimmer and things get worse before, hopefully somehow, get better
Well, not being one of the absolutely worst imaginable, doesn't make you good by default. Lula is not a good candidate - it just so happens that Bolsonaro is incomparably much, much worse. It speaks to the state of the Brazilian political system that, with millions and millions of people that could potentially have been candidates, it's still these two that turn up as the two "best options" from the political process.
It's a moot point now, because Lula doesn't really stand a snowman's chance in hell of winning this election. But you could argue that he, and PT, threw this one. I don't think it's far fetched, anyway, to say that a better candidate could have won this election.
That's how the US works as well.
Well my understanding is that no one is doing much for the favelas. Not even Lula in his first term did much for them. And he's capable of much less now with the endemic Brazilian right wing funded and supported by the wealthy in my country. But that's about as bad as I've seen. So yeah I really don't understand the characterization or lumping him with the others. Their legislature there is chock full of bolansario allies. Who are Express enemies of Lula, and the rest of the legislature aren't really allies either.
I suspect the characterization may have to do with the more radical-minded. If he's not fomenting revolution somehow. He's an evil failure?
I find it difficult to consider a politician in power who wants to exercise control over Internet speech in this way a good guy.
The solution to problems like this would be the fediverse, his campaign could run its own instance…
He wants his posts to actually show up on Facebook? I don't really see that as regulating internet speech. Meta has meddled in tons of elections and I think it's fair to complain about.
Running his own instance would be about the equivalent of just making their own website or blog. The point of social media is the dissemination to the public, and just having a Lemmy/whatever instance doesn't accomplish that.
It's definitely a difficult issue. We never should have allowed the Internet to become as centralized as it is now. 😕