168
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
168 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
88734 readers
2957 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I was going to suggest covering them up, as a legal way to turn them off without physically dismantling, since they're technically not college property. But that's exactly what the campus staff did and Flock kept coming to uncover them? Lol wtf
I'd bet if this was a larger college/university, they wouldn't have pulled something like this.
Something good did come out of this. It is a concrete example of how the company will behave if you sign a contract with them. Public officials and administrators will be more likely to care if they risk losing their power like this. It also makes it clear that you're not paying Flock to "help" your own region, you're doing it to help people in other regions.
The simple solution to this is for the college to physically remove the cameras from their mountings. The poles our buildings that the cameras are mounted to are owned by the university. They should then inform Flock that they can pick the cameras up at the school's lost at found.
And then "oops"...they fall to the ground broken.