66
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YeahToast@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

How do you see the longevity of it. You obviously learnt how to code before ai. What about those learning now that are learning only having access to ai. Id anticipate the quality over time will deteriorate

[-] Havatra@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I think we'll unfortunately see a degradation over time of capable programmers, as it's with most other things: Humans learn poorly from seeing things being done for them, rather than doing it themselves. AI can be a good resource for iteration and a sort of rubber duck, and even for explaining things (with external confirmation). But as it currently stands, people find it much more attractive to just let AI do the work for them. That's the most prominent work culture after all, based on capitalistic values: Economic growth above all.

I see it in schools as well, unfortunately: Students find it much more appealing to get good grades than to actually learn. Not everyone, of course, but still way too many.

And I do understand many of the students: The bar for junior programmers has now increased, as a lot of employers simply think "why hire a human that is on the same level as AI?".

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

Students find it much more appealing to get good grades than to actually learn.

Because there is a direct impact on your chances for a better life. Having better grades give you access to better schools (and in the US, scholarships as well).

The emphasis of our school system is results.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
66 points (81.7% liked)

Linux

15185 readers
195 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS