117

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/68187610

According to interviews with more than two dozen workers, all of whom spoke under the condition of anonymity to avoid jeopardizing their employment, publishers are now using LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT to email literary agents, write publicity and back-cover copy, design cover art, and generate marketing materials, often at the direction of their executives.

At the same time, multiple editorial staffers say the widely publicized cases of authors accused of using LLMs to help write their books—like Hachette’s horror novel Shy Girl or Macmillan’s crime thriller Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body—are just the tip of the iceberg. “Every single imprint has a story of someone very esteemed who had a book canceled because of blatant AI use” without ever making the news, one editor says.

At HarperCollins senior leaders purchased Claude licenses from Anthropic months ago “but very quickly realized they didn’t know how to implement them,” according to a current employee. Dozens of junior- and senior-level staff were then “voluntold” to become “AI Champions” and were tasked with discovering use cases in monthly brainstorming sessions with staff across the company.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frostypanda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've suspected some cover art I've seen for books has been AI (but I can't always reliably tell). Kind of gross that some of it probably is.

Sadly, as much as I see people against gen AI online, people in real life aren't (at least where I'm at). They're gobbling up the slop.

I don't even want to imagine what things will look like in twenty years, when the kids who grew up with this thinks this is the new normal.

Going forward, either you embrace gen AI, or you stick to media produced roughly before 2022 (or before 2019 to virtually avoid it totally). For writing, I'm not sure how the future will look for those who care. At least you can go see live performances of music, for instance, or even watch someone paint something.

For now, maybe writers will ban together and create trusted groups of human made stuff. If we're lucky, maybe AI slop for the most part will be contained to corporations. Indie publishers could become the place for human made stuff. Assuming the corporations don't find a way to drown out the indie publishers. But even if indie publishers take off in this direction, for how long will the people actually interested in art/writing free of gen AI care?

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

The problem is the gap closing. Only a few years ago, even last year, AI creations were still obvious. There's still tells, but they grow more and more subtle, and some indicators used by AI filtering are how some people write and draw. Where do you think the training for it came from? I see claims of AI and bots a lot as reactionary and then it's shown they were people. "AI slop" is even used as a slur and dismissal rather than an actual complaint of non-human source.

I don't have an answer. It's a huge problem, it should never have been let get this far legally and technically, and the gate is open now and it's not going away, even when the bubble breaks. And I find it very hypocritical that publishers have dropped to this level when for years the industry has been screaming against AI. Yet they're using it.

Modern cover art was total trash before Gen AI took off. Now it's just more recycled trash.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
117 points (99.2% liked)

Books

8608 readers
295 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS