According to interviews with more than two dozen workers, all of whom spoke under the condition of anonymity to avoid jeopardizing their employment, publishers are now using LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT to email literary agents, write publicity and back-cover copy, design cover art, and generate marketing materials, often at the direction of their executives.
At the same time, multiple editorial staffers say the widely publicized cases of authors accused of using LLMs to help write their books—like Hachette’s horror novel Shy Girl or Macmillan’s crime thriller Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body—are just the tip of the iceberg. “Every single imprint has a story of someone very esteemed who had a book canceled because of blatant AI use” without ever making the news, one editor says.
At HarperCollins senior leaders purchased Claude licenses from Anthropic months ago “but very quickly realized they didn’t know how to implement them,” according to a current employee. Dozens of junior- and senior-level staff were then “voluntold” to become “AI Champions” and were tasked with discovering use cases in monthly brainstorming sessions with staff across the company.
As a disabled author, I write my own prose but use LLMs for editing and cover art. I am forced into using AI for these tasks as the human equivalent charges more than I'm even allowed to have in a month. It was simple math, $20/mo for AI usage vs ~$2000+ for an editor and then around another ~$2000+ for an artist. So budget constraints forced my hand, and I will use any cheap resource I can find. In the US, if you're on disability you have a $2000/month hard limit with a combined cash+assets. So why should I give up a passion for financial gatekeeping?