307
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Acknowledging the reality that ICE was a massive part of the outcry against trump in his first term is "russian talking points"? Jesus christ Russiagate has you guys whipped into a xenophobic frenzy. Goebbels would be bored with how simple you would be to corral. If Putin said the sky is blue, would you suddenly insist it is black?

Anyway:

  1. Ad hominem. You are not adressing the argument, but instead the character of it. Where the argument comes from does not make it any less cogent.
  2. "Everyone who disagrees with me is an insidious foreigner" and other insane conspiracies for the right wing mind.
  3. No it isn't. Source your claim.
[-] dummyboymc23@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago
[-] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

You're a xenophobic conspiracist. What you define yourself as does not matter, what matters is what you believe, what you say and what you do. And what you do is support genociders, what you say is that critique of democrats is some nefarious foreign plot and what you believe is that basic facts can be disregarded if they are russian. This makes you a right wing conspiracist.
Also I edited the comment, look at it again.

[-] dummyboymc23@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago
[-] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I spelled that out pretty clearly. If youre going to do this lazy obtuse thing then you have to at least do it about something that has not been spelled out explicitly.

[-] dummyboymc23@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago

I'm anti genocide. Who am I xenophobic against!?

[-] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

You are voting for democrats, you are voting for genocide. The rest has been spelled out to you. Go and read the comment, quote me the part you pretend not to understand but you really just have a gut reaction of frustration to, without any real counterargument because it is ultimately correct.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
307 points (84.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9513 readers
336 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS