There's nothing, in particular, of health concern about corn syrup or high-fructose corn syrup besides it being sugary. It is used in everything because corn is incredibly subsidized by the US government and so the syrup created from it is very very cheap. The amount of sugar in general in processed foods is a problem if eaten to excess, but whether that sugar comes from cane, corn, or any other food safe plant, it makes little difference for overall health risks.
If this person is having digestive issues/discomfort from it, I would suggest that one of 3 things is happening. 1) it's psychsomatic because they assume it's worse for them. 2) They have an allergy to something in the drink. Maybe the corn, maybe something else. 3) They have fructose intolerance from fructose malabsortion in the small intestine. If the fructose isn't all absorbed before making it to your large intestine, it can ferment some from your gut bacteria and cause bloating and gas. This is uncomfortable, but not dangerous to your health.
Fructose is not chemically dangerous and it is naturally found in many foods (fruits, honey, vegetables, ... corn, etc.). The only difference between the glucose in cane sugar and typical corn syrup and the fructose in High Fructose Corn Syrup is that fructose is a larger more complex molecule, tastes sweeter, and might absorb slower in your digestive tract (which as arguably better for your blood sugar and calorie intake). There is good reason to be concerned about HFCS in processed foods, but the concern should just be that it is over used due to it being a cheap way to make foods taste good, and we have too much sugar in our diets overall.
You are right, however high fructose corn sirup has an extremely high glycemic index which tend to make people fat. So in comparaison to other forms of sugar, it is one of the worst for your health. The health of americans would be better if corn wasn't as subsidized.
It has a glycemic index of 56-62 depending on the fructose to glucose ratios. That's considered a moderate GI, not extremely high. Sucrose (standard table sugar) has a GI of about 65. White bread (70+) and baked potatoes (about 86) have a higher glycemic index.
I don't disagree that we would be more healthy and less fat were corn not subsidized. But that would be because sweetened foods wouldn't be as cheap so we couldn't afford to eat as much and the markets for them and drive to sell them to us wouldn't be as huge. Not because HFCS is, in itself, less healthy than any other sugar source.
The sugar content of British candy is actually higher.
I think they are saying the corn derivatives are the issue, not the sugar.
There's nothing, in particular, of health concern about corn syrup or high-fructose corn syrup besides it being sugary. It is used in everything because corn is incredibly subsidized by the US government and so the syrup created from it is very very cheap. The amount of sugar in general in processed foods is a problem if eaten to excess, but whether that sugar comes from cane, corn, or any other food safe plant, it makes little difference for overall health risks.
If this person is having digestive issues/discomfort from it, I would suggest that one of 3 things is happening. 1) it's psychsomatic because they assume it's worse for them. 2) They have an allergy to something in the drink. Maybe the corn, maybe something else. 3) They have fructose intolerance from fructose malabsortion in the small intestine. If the fructose isn't all absorbed before making it to your large intestine, it can ferment some from your gut bacteria and cause bloating and gas. This is uncomfortable, but not dangerous to your health.
Fructose is not chemically dangerous and it is naturally found in many foods (fruits, honey, vegetables, ... corn, etc.). The only difference between the glucose in cane sugar and typical corn syrup and the fructose in High Fructose Corn Syrup is that fructose is a larger more complex molecule, tastes sweeter, and might absorb slower in your digestive tract (which as arguably better for your blood sugar and calorie intake). There is good reason to be concerned about HFCS in processed foods, but the concern should just be that it is over used due to it being a cheap way to make foods taste good, and we have too much sugar in our diets overall.
You are right, however high fructose corn sirup has an extremely high glycemic index which tend to make people fat. So in comparaison to other forms of sugar, it is one of the worst for your health. The health of americans would be better if corn wasn't as subsidized.
It has a glycemic index of 56-62 depending on the fructose to glucose ratios. That's considered a moderate GI, not extremely high. Sucrose (standard table sugar) has a GI of about 65. White bread (70+) and baked potatoes (about 86) have a higher glycemic index.
I don't disagree that we would be more healthy and less fat were corn not subsidized. But that would be because sweetened foods wouldn't be as cheap so we couldn't afford to eat as much and the markets for them and drive to sell them to us wouldn't be as huge. Not because HFCS is, in itself, less healthy than any other sugar source.
Thank you for double checking, you're totally right. It's my mistake. I was quoted 80-95 by you know what 🥲
Nice try Big Corn.
Big Sweaty Corn
My Nebraska-based mascot-sona?
That's what I'm saying, they have an issue with corn. Im not a doctor or psycholgist to reason why they have an issue.