I am a pest to my representatives

Keep it up. I'm in Floriduh so talking to our representatives is more or less like talking to a brick wall. They may accumulate counts of how many people raise an issue, but for the most part they're serving the federal administration's agenda, not listening to their constituents.

People have to audit that shit to make it serviceable, which greats bigger workloads

I mostly ignored LLM code generation until around August of 2025 - it was still pretty raw back then, but it was showing potential for significant improvement, and since then there has been significant improvement. At this point, I find that if I ride herd on the LLM agent and keep it focused, structured, addressing technical debt frequently, etc. I can actually review the generated code more quickly and easily than similarly mature code by human developers. What is coming out of models like Opus 5.5 now is looking like what I would write if I had all the time in the world to cover all the edge cases, handle all the errors, do the logging and auditing and all the other "good stuff". It does explode the code for what was a simple "happy path" thing into a much larger structure that takes the real world problems into account and gets in front of them, handling them gracefully and presenting clear messages about what went wrong when unavoidable problems happen.

I guess what I'm saying is: yeah, we're still getting more code to review, but it's getting easier to review and the presence of meaningful automated tests and consistent documentation and non-rotten traceability from requirements through all that is actually resulting in lower overall workloads once you look at the big picture of what it takes to maintain code in the real world with security and other issues and not just the happy insecure proof of concept and ship it world.

Breaking the spirit of mostly volunteers with such inexpertly crafted code is just not the best idea.

Yeah, if your models are giving you inexpertly crafted code, you need to keep iterating with them until it's expertly crafted before shipping it, don't just throw up a pull request because some bogus tests passed. And, there's still a difference among models - they've all improved rather dramatically over the last 12 months, but for my purposes (coding robust, secure, safe applications) Claude's Opus and Sonnet are still "in the lead" by a pretty good margin. Other models are better at other things...

Trainers do act badly because they weren’t regulated to hell and back

There's not enough transparency or accountability in the global business landscape for any kind of regulation to actually work. If these regulations are going to have any chance, the first step has to be true transparency - like FOSS does with open source development repositories, and more.

people paid for their data or compensated for hammering personal websites.

Keep dreaming. It would be a wonderful world, but it's far from where we are.

said models can be made to reproduce phrases

Like English majors can quote Keats after graduation... I'm not sure that's proof of plagarism in their other writing.

an absolute morally compromised fool

Yeah, it's been an interesting ride this cycle - seems like they're trying to tear down the government institutions in preparation for something like Palpatine disbanding the Senate... destroy all confidence by blowing up every problem of the past and flaunting it as something actively done at the highest levels. If they succeed in holding power through the upcoming mid-terms the ride is only going to get more interesting...