239

Cornell University is suspending parties and other social events at fraternity houses for the rest of the academic year and will give the New York State Police a role in investigating sex crimes on campus, university officials announced Tuesday, amid mounting outrage over its handling of allegations that a female student was sexually assaulted at a fraternity house in 2024.

The measures announced by Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff include a suspension of all parties and social events at Interfraternity Council houses through the end of the 2026-27 academic year and a new “zero tolerance” policy for violations that would result in the immediate emergency suspension of a chapter.

“These measures will provide time for a thorough review of fraternity life at Cornell to determine whether and how it can safely continue,” Kotlikoff wrote in a letter to the campus community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

First amendment guarantees freedom of association.

[-] ElDuderino@lemmus.org 1 points 12 hours ago

And as long as you don't dare criticize the government, the police will happily let you associate.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

fair point. they can still associate, just not have the formal recognition as greek houses they tend to get in college.

or maybe just the colleges need to “allow” the rape investigations from the cops, instead of doing it themselves. that’s a start.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Cornell, like a lot of major universities, does have their own full police department, with the same powers as the city police. So there's no difference between themselves and the cops.

Whether there's a conflict of interest because they are university police is a separate question, and I would say yes.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

yeah. learned that when i was (working) at vandy. seemed odd.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It doesn't guarantee that association has to happen on houses near or on school property. It doesn't mean the school has to be a partner with that association.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago

But what would the actual difference be if they had no institutional affiliation? Does the university own their houses and could kick them out? Aren't these fraternities rich and could just buy another one?

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Less legitimacy, less prestige, less convenience, etc.

There are multiple answers to your questions depending on what college were talking about. Sometimes the schools rent the frat houses, sometimes they are owned through alumni corporations that work with the schools.

Yeah they totally could and will buy another house off campus, and I am fine with that. They will have to deal with Municipal police instead of campus police. I am not fine with them having some of the best buildings on campus.

They also need to lose tax exemption status.

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2026
239 points (99.2% liked)

News

39536 readers
1747 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS