42
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago

This reads like proactive self censorship. I sincerely doubt that any of those fears would actually come to pass.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 14 hours ago

The production company behind her TV adaptations had informed her they would no longer be able to pay her royalties through British banking, and that if it knew she intended to donate to PA the company would be liable to prosecution . Her publisher Faber has also come to the same conclusion.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

There's a characteristically interesting look at this by David Allen Green, including:

one would think it unlikely that the British state would prosecute a famous Irish author and an even more famous publishing house. But little about the terrorism law of the UK makes sense at the moment, since the ludicrous decision of then home secretary Yvette Cooper and the Home Office to proscribe what is essentially a direct-action protest group as a terrorist organisation.

His view is that they must think there's a reasonable chance of it coming to pass or they wouldn't be taking the financial hit.

Of course, it's great publicity for them and her, so maybe it balances out in the end.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
42 points (97.7% liked)

Books

8617 readers
173 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS