241
FTC probes Anthropic and OpenAI "breaches", wonders who should be liable
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
241 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
88814 readers
6008 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
True, a narrow reading would be "if you tell the machine to do X and it does X, X should be attributed to you".
A more broad reading (which I think is the right one, but I'm not holding my breath over since it'd tank the economy) is "if you build a machine that can conceivably do X, and then without anyone doing anything else, it does X, X should be attributed to you." I agree that the quote from the FTC chair seems more like #1 than #2, but one would have to draw the line somewhere.