223
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by supersquirrel@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev

pauses massive bong rip

Wait what this doesn't sound like reality

checks

Hmmm

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Why do we need defender if red hat exists?

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

What does Red Hat have to do with an anti virus?

[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I haven't been into linux since 2008 so forgive me on this one if I seem ignorant but isn't there redhat security and isn't that basically the same exact thing as defender except you just pay for it? Like isn't there redhat network security or some shit like that? So if linux already has a somewhat legacy security, why do we need to add microslop defender on top of it?

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

No, Red Hat for the most part is not in the security game. There is OpenSCAP. Red Hat OpenShift does have Advanced Cluster Security available. But generally no Red Hat doesn't make security products like that. I guess maybe the closest would be using Satellite to manage clients and see their compliance. I don't know if Satellite can measure OpenSCAP compliance... Yes, there is a lot of security built in, but no they don't really do many explicitly security products.

[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you for teaching me something new. ๐Ÿ˜

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
223 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

15259 readers
426 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS