-12
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
-12 points (38.5% liked)
Just Post
1658 readers
211 users here now
Just post something 💛
Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.
Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.
Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Despite its title it does not take into account the entire biocycle, it does not do a carbon cycle assessment either. which the authors implicitly acknowledge "there is no additional warming under a constant level of CH4 emissions"... i.e. they recognize a stable ruminant population does not result in infinite warming.
Because the title of the post is "Eating beef is a great way to prove that you don't care about the environment". So eating natural beef on natural pastures eating natural food doesn't demonstrate a lack of care for the environment.
There is no additional warming because methane breaks down in the atmosphere eventually, so if we generate x quantity in 2026 and the same quantity in 2030, global warming will not increase. That does not mean that the stable amount of methane in the atmosphere right now is low and does not contribute to climate change. And if we consume more livestock due to an increase of population, the warming will increase. This is what i understand