-12

Beef is by far the most environmentally costly food most people can put on their plate, which is why choosing it over alternatives is such a telling signal. Per gram of protein, beef produces many times the greenhouse gas emissions of chicken, eggs, or legumes, mostly from cattle methane and from the forest cleared for pasture and feed. It also demands far more land and water than almost any other common food. These facts are widely published and easy to find, and cheaper, lower-impact options are available in nearly every grocery store. So when someone keeps choosing beef anyway, they are showing that the environmental cost isn’t a factor in their decision. Nobody has to be perfect, but picking the highest-impact option when better ones are easy to reach is a pretty clear statement of priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheYellowFrog@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

There are a lot of deforestation for clearing forest for pasture and growing food for animal. The enormous quantity of meat that we eat is not natural in the ecosystem. And we can live without beef perfectly

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
-12 points (38.5% liked)

Just Post

1658 readers
193 users here now

Just post something 💛

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS