326
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Orwi@programming.dev to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

No, I misread and thought you said corporate no cooperate. Now I have no idea what you're saying.

[-] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT CO-OPS!! THEY'RE USING THE WORD COOPERATE AS AN ADJECTIVE TO REFER TO CO-OPS!

"A COOPERATE MANAGER"

"A cooperate manager." LMAO

This smuck is like: "corporate managers---not to be confused with cooperate managers."

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I removed that part, because apparently people don't get it.
But I would wager that cooperate managers would be more trusted than corporate ones. Without them being any different in all practical matters.

Also Science is not entirely capitalist, business managers are. So saying that science would be trusted more in a on capitalist society doesn't make the least bit of sense.

[-] psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

doesn't make the least bit of sense.

cooperate managers

Oh, boy.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I suppose you are aware that it means a manager of a company co-owned by the workers, so I must admit I don't get your response?

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
326 points (99.4% liked)

science

29489 readers
549 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS