416
submitted 1 day ago by Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] codydodd@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago

What is terrible is it will be hard to tell sometimes, publishers are awash with slop.

Its to the point if you can prove it was written before LLMs existed then the value of your work is suddenly much higher.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

This reminds me of low-background steel. Certain applications of steel requires very low amounts of radiation. After nuclear testing started releasing radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere, newly forged steel incorporated those radioactive isotopes. The only way to get low-background steel is by finding a pre-atomic age source of scrap steel like a ship wreck.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 23 hours ago

Publishers are using AI to edit and approve books. But that seems to fall into their acceptance of using AI as tools, just not the actual writing process. So it's basically a placeholder rule until they figure it out and change it, and they say as much.

[-] codydodd@lemmy.ca 6 points 16 hours ago

I know several publishers with strict rules about LLM use. Some folks here write as if LLMs are used absolutely everywhere but there are not.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

I admire your take, but it would amaze me if there are many fortune 500, or even fortune 1000, companies not using generative AI. Especially those focused on white collar work.

I think the real question is how much outsourcing of thought each company, and each department, is pushing on its employees. AI as a proof reader? AI as a ghost writer? Those are very different things.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social -2 points 6 hours ago

Though, even the ones with strict rules may sometimes have difficulty determining if something was written with AI. Especially if the "author" does some basic proofreading and cleans it up manually before submitting it to the publisher.

[-] codydodd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

True I ironically see momentary spelling mistakes as a sign of humanity, informally.

[-] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 7 points 1 day ago

If the authors dont disclose to publishers they cant know too. For authors they get pressure to write faster because everyone is atleast AI assisted.

TBH i dont care if its AI written but the result of AI writing is sloppy. Lots of fluff and weird wording. Also sloppy research is likely as AI spits out facts and the authos dont have to look into the source anymore. Peer reviewing must become stronger and will be a quality sign for publishers in future.

[-] codydodd@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

Not everyone is AI assisted for every single project.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
416 points (99.8% liked)

Canada

12546 readers
1052 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS