1077
Am I the only one bothered by this?
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
1077 points (94.4% liked)
memes
23097 readers
2388 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm also on team 'no poster'.
I'm far more likely to buy fruit from that place with a handwritten sign on a piece of paper than I am from someplace with a shitty AI slop picture of what a robot thinks fruit looks like. If you're going to have pictures of your product, it had better be actual pictures of the product I'm actually buying. I don't want to see some AI idealized picture of it -- I want to see what it actually looks like. And, no, you don't need to hire a local artist for that. You've got product to sell? You've got a phone in your pocket? Take a fucking photo of it. Put that photo on your poster. Done. No money spent on artists.
Honestly a photo of a couple fruits in perfect condition is not an accurate representation either. It gives the same amount of information as an AI poster: zero. You're getting lies either way. Perhaps best to just accept that filler images on advertising material is always going to be inaccurate, whether it's AI or not.
If it's an actual photo of the actual product, it's still far more accurate than some AI bullshit could ever be.
How so? Just because the store was able to procure one good fruit means nothing about the quality of the others.
It's still an actual image of an actual fruit, which they (presumably) did actually sell after taking the picture of it.
It may not be a very representative sample, but it least it is a sample, not a figment of a robot's imagination.
I'd argue that 0.0001 information is not meaningfully bigger than 0. So at least in that regard, I couldn't care less if they used AI