14
submitted 2 weeks ago by donaldcheese@r1b.it to c/tidalpunk@slrpnk.net

Hi c/tidalpunk — I keep a small guide called Read Wrong: ten sea creatures, each with one sourced fact that undercuts the postcard version. The idea is how much work a label does. Most of us copy the label before we've actually looked at the animal.

The entry that reframed the whole thing for me is Steller's sea cow. It got read as endless meat — too big, too slow, too many — and it was gone 27 years after it was scientifically described. The label that kills isn't "worthless." Worthless leaves you alive to argue. Infinite leaves nothing underneath to protect.

All ten (plus the one still going), each tagged with what kind of claim it's actually making, honest count printed, sources on every fact: https://telegra.ph/Read-Wrong-Ten-Sea-Creatures-10-18

Free to read, no signup. I wrote it, so call it self-promo if that's your line — but I want the corrections. Which creature here do you think people read most wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NightFantom@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

Reads like slop, did you write it or prompt it?

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
14 points (81.8% liked)

Ocean Conservation & Tidalpunk

803 readers
5 users here now

A community to discuss news about our oceans & seas, marine conservation, sustainable aquatic tech, and anything related to Tidalpunk - the ocean-centric subgenre of Solarpunk.

Similar communities:

Posts and comments from Meta or X will be removed. See this post for more info.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS