1390
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] neatchee@piefed.social 105 points 4 days ago

But the bus driver supports genocide. The whole bus is rotten. We should let the bus go off the cliff and then build a new bus. I'm sure enough of us will survive the crash to build a better bus afterwards. Many people will die but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.

🤡🤡🤡

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 63 points 4 days ago

But the bus driver supports genocide. The whole bus is rotten.

You ever notice how the 'burn it down' people fall into two camps?

  1. not in the affected area: chicken-hawk types who advocate the sacrifice of others.
  2. in the affected area: I didn't know the leopards of societal collapse, starvation, and violence, would eat my face.
[-] neatchee@piefed.social 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Type 2 also includes the "why's it taking so long? Look at all these people suffering through the collapse. We need to make it collapse faster so we get to the good part faster" people, without acknowledging that this is what collapse looks like: lots of suffering

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 23 points 4 days ago

Yeah but you can just blame all that suffering on the people trying to hold the whole thing together, because obviously if you just let the whole thing collapse then the suffering will end abruptly and a magical utopia can finally descend from the heavens! /s

[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

You joke, but the number of people I've seen posting along the lines of 'I don't this, I'm exempted!' Is extremely infuriating. The individualism bubble has them thinking it's a shield from reality.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago

Oh, I know. Believe me, do I know...

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago

Who said there was a good part to get to? Turns out damaging the bus in any manner, whether by driving, inaction, or burning it on the road, is all bad. No one has mentioned hitting the brakes... oh wait, which one of you cut the lines?

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago

But the bus driver said it's going to take a few extra hours to get to the destination because of all the buses creating congestion on the highway. So clearly burning the bus to the ground is the only viable option, and in fact, if you don't light the match then you actually support traffic jams! /s

[-] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Making the downfall faster is fighting stupid with stupid. They are still bringing on the end of the world or whatever evangelicals are imagining.

There will be so much shit to eat your grandchildren will still be at it. I do not understand accelerationism or similar ideas one bit.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 29 points 4 days ago

"The five non-voters are the true anarchists who see the violence inherent in the system. Actually the two who voted against driving off the cliff are wrong for even supporting a system in which voters can choose to drive the bus off the cliff. They're actually worse than the three who voted to drive the bus off the cliff, because they tacitly approve of driving the bus off the cliff just by participating in the system which allows the bus to be driven off the cliff, while fooling themselves into feeling morally absolved of the decision to drive off the cliff! So the non-voters are the only virtuous ones in this situation"

(The /s should be clear, right?)

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

(The /s should be clear, right?)

... are you new to the Fediverse? I encounter such arguments uttered unironically virtually every time I browse here - especially in election season.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago

You're... not wrong...

Might I should have included a second "...right?" after that statement

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It's a toughie. Some people think indications of sarcasm ruin the fun.

I'm of the opinion that one should always clearly indicate satire due to Poe's Law.

I like to put it in italics and sometimes attribute it to the group I'm parodying, or if an individual, I add "probably." Observe:

"This entire thread is woke garbage. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. I'll drive this bus off that cliff better than anyone ever has. Better than Biden ever could. Biden tried to stop the bus and fill it with illegals. Putin promised me there's rainbows at the bottom of that valley, and not the radical left rainbows either. The kind that leads you to beautiful, clean, black gold."

- Donald Jeffreyepsteinsfavoritecustomer Trump, probably

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 days ago

Anakin stare intensifies

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

You've angered the .ml and .dbzer0 trolls.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Tankie tears are my favorite beverage.

You call it clowning, but this is literally the strategy that was used to defeat slavery. The "play within the system" planned was attempted for nearly a hundred years by the Abolitionists. They tried your way again and again. Slavery only ended when they abandoned your way and started a third party.

[-] neatchee@piefed.social -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Except a third party is still voting? I only clown on third party voters when they:

a) split the vote of a single party instead of pulling from both parties and new voters (because it only helps the remaining party cement their dominance in the next election through gerrymandering etc)

b) have clown policies that appeal only to emotion, with no path to implementation (I'm looking at you, Jill Stein and Ross Perot)

Show me a legitimate third party candidate with good policy proposals and a plan to gain votes without guaranteeing the worst candidate wins and I'll vote for 'em, campaign for 'em, and more.

Third party isn't burning the bus down or letting it drive off the cliff. Third party (when done well) is a third bus driver choice. I'm all for that.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Oops, all of the people who had the institutional knowledge to build a new bus died in the bus accident.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Thank you for the clown emojis because I 100% thought you were seroius because of how many fools there are on Lemmy that believe that exact sentiment and they aren't joking. Juvenile fools.

[-] neatchee@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

I almost added a /s too just to be safe

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

You can fairly reliably tell whether or not such a post/comment is made genuinely (albeit perhaps astroturfically) or sardonically by merit of the instance from which the commenter posts.

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

But you do need to build a new bus. You should start talking about how to stop the bus, let out the passengers, then setting fire to it.

Meanwhile: .ML BAD

[-] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It sounds stupid because it is...

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Many people will die but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.

But not from the genocides?

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

in both the thought experiment and the US vote, the genocide happens no matter which way you vote, or if you don’t vote at all… there are no choices that have a real chance of reducing the genocide

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

the genocide happens no matter which way you vote

Im glad yall are finally being honest.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago

How does social collapse stop the genocides? Explain that part in detail, because I'm pretty sure any global socioeconomic collapse will accelerate existing genocides and probably add quite a few more. Like, do you numpties understand half the world dies in your best case scenarios, the first of which will absolutely be all the people being genocided currently?

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

Pedal to the metal, accelerate!

[-] Pratai@piefed.ca -1 points 4 days ago

Appropriate emojis considering the message. Hoping they’re in place of a /s

[-] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago
[-] Pratai@piefed.ca -1 points 3 days ago

Good to know!!

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
1390 points (96.5% liked)

Political Memes

12739 readers
1738 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS