this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
487 points (92.9% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3883 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Sen. John Fetterman has a message for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party: get in line behind President Joe Biden.

He continues to recover from an auditory processing disorder caused by a stroke that happened during the 2022 campaign.

Both Sanders and Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York have also endorsed the incumbent president, despite their occasional criticisms from the left.

"At the end of the day, like, do you think Donald Trump is going to be talking about issues and, you know, his white papers?"

Fetterman also recalled a conversation with Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema in which he said he would remain "neutral on all of that," despite his previous suggestion that he would support Gallego, along with the fact that his top political strategist is now working for the Arizona congressman.

Last week, during a similar briefing with reporters, Fetterman referred to the potential impeachment of President Biden as a "big circlejerk on the fringe right."


The original article contains 434 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that we can't endorse him without comparing him to the dumpster fire on the opposite side is why we don't like him. If "better than Trump" is all you've got going for you, we might as well vote for a pile of wet socks.

He promised not to upset the capitalist apple cart, and he hasn't. He's not a progressive.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strong disagree. I've found Biden to far, far exceed my expectations for him. I've been very happy with his presidency, above and beyond the fact that he's not Trump.

That said, I'm curious which specific policies of his you disagree with. I have several, but I'd like to see yours.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah I wouldn't call him progressive by any reasonable definition of the word, but he's helped pass some of the most consequential legislation of our lifetime, and he did it while pulling the economy out of a dumpster fire tailspin and into an improbable soft landing, and also getting us onto the other side of an actual plague. He's been far more effective than I ever imagined he'd be. I didn't vote for him in the 2020 primary, but I'll damn sure vote to reelect him. My only point of contention is that I wish he'd dump Harris and organize a kind of VP primary to pick another running mate. If he dies in office, I worry that she's just not up to the task.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Experience Experience Experience. We needed an adult. We needed someone to come in, clean up a bunch of messes by making some tough calls and not just waiting around for perfect. He’s greatly exceeded that imo.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is there a single Republican candidate that progressives would support over Biden?

I look at it as Biden will pass any progressive legislation given to him; he isn't the problem. Instead, I would look at the tons of legislator positions and ask them what they are doing to be progressive at the state and local levels. Lock those people in so on the next election, Democratic presidential candidates will need progressive support.

And prep the House and Senate so progressive legislation can get passed. Biden has only vetoed 6 bills in office; I don't see him being the logjam for progressive legislation.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol no one wants to answer your first question.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden doesn’t want to pass progressive legislation, if he had any inclination towards progressive he wouldn’t have stood against union railroad workers.

He’s a right leaning centrist through and through, it’s just that in America that looks “progressive” when we’re used our right wing party being progressively more fascist over the last few decades

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

The bill he passed went through with a veto proof majority in the Senate and there is no indication he wouldn't have passed the bill to enforce union demands if it got to his desk.

Why not challenge the Democrats in Congress who voted to end the strike?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I look at it as Biden will pass any progressive legislation given to him

Biden in the primary:

I'm the only one that can get republicans to vote for the (progressive) Dem party platform!

Biden defenders after Biden can't even get Democratic Senators to support the platform:

What kind of idiot though Biden could change anyone's mind! Of course a US president can never accomplish anything... except when something good happens then we're going to say Biden did it single handidly