332

AI investment has helped keep markets and economic growth ticking along, but the IMF fears the boom could quickly turn to bust if the promised profits fail to materialize. With tech giants borrowing billions and investors piling into the same handful of companies, a selloff could leave more than just Silicon Valley nursing a hangover.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 days ago

The whole AI bubble is just one big bet: "AGI is around the corner and will replace all white collar jobs"

Now, LLMs get slowly better but aren't AGI and it's unclear if our current approach is even capable of reaching AGI.

Sadly the US went 'all-in' on the bet and everyone except the ultra rich will feel the pain.

[-] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

They know climate change will take down capitalism. They are hoping for AGI to save them.

[-] GardenGeek@europe.pub 22 points 2 days ago

The lack of progress is one thing.

The value for money is another: AI companies are still burning through vast sums of capital, while users are indeed using the products more and more... but still nowhere near at a price that would even cover the companies’ costs, let alone be profitable. If each token costs a few dollars, demand is likely to shrink significantly again... because as long as the systems operate stochastically and, logically, produce erroneous results, it may take a very large number of tokens to obtain a result that’s actually usable (this is especially true when using AI to replace workers whose tasks and skills you actually have no clue about).

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

So even if the bet materializes, we lose. If it doesn't, we also lose because the economy implodes. Fun times.

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Best thing about this whole AI bubble is that the mask is off and everyone can see. The rich will dump us in a instant.

[-] Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

AGI will never happen with LLMs, but if you think in terms of a human brain out can be effective language and output and image recognition module. But there's no there there. Something else entirely is needed for true thought and sentience. But llm ai is already sufficient to translate machine thought into language sentences. You just need the spark of life that can actually think for itself.

[-] puz@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

You just need the spark of life that can actually think for itself.

I know it's probably not intentional but you make it sound as if "just putting a spark of life" into the machine is easy

[-] Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No, the spark of life implies something magical or unknown that you can't make. Like a human can never make a spark on their own, you need something from the outside to make it or happen.

[-] puz@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago
[-] horsesaysweird@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

It may be easy. The issue is that nobody knows what that even means.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
332 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

8533 readers
2419 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS