63

This is and update on the php2shell vulnerability and a response to the blog post from https://lemmy.world/post/53441818 : https://eliastaylor.com/noexploit/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Luckyfriend222@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No. Unattended upgrades are a nightmare in production. If you patch stuff manually or even with ansible, you can see what the hell broke during the upgrade. Whereas with unattended access you walk in Monday morning with half your systems down and no idea which update broke it.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

Unattended application to test. If it passes testing, unattended application to prod.

I still wouldn't do this for any critical service, but for a "move fast and break things" system like Facebook where it goes down and nothing bad happens, sure.

[-] needanke@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For professionals and buisnesses, I see where you are coming from (although there is an argument to be made for prioritizing security over uptime whenever acceptable).

But for selfhosting/private users? If I wake up one morning and my stuff is not working anymore, I can just roll back to the last good backup and then apply patches manually to see where it goes wrong. Way better to have some downtime when I don't notice (i.e. don't need the service) than having open vulnerabilities when a fix exists.

[-] Thaurin@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yeah, for businesses I can see that, but selfhosting, meh. I have just one personal server firewalled and Wireguarded, so the PHP vulnerability wasn't even publicly exposed. Even so, I have never had any issues with Debian's unattended security upgrades in the last 5 years.

In enterprise environments with a hundred servers, though, you will want to do something else than I do. :)

But even then, don't enterprises run a good WAF in front of their public web sites that would have received the patch automatically?

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
63 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

63158 readers
621 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS