35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] calliope@retrolemmy.com 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Large files is actually what git-lfs was made for. I haven’t used it extensively but the project has been around for quite a while (implying some measure of stability/userbase). I heard about it over ten years ago.

But your point still stands. GitHub isn’t the solution unless you have few files that you don’t mind being public (because I think GitHub has exposed private repos before).

[-] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago

Yeh, there are workarounds for large & binary files.
Git-LFS stores a pointer to the file that is stored elsewhere.
So... you have a git repo of files that point to somewhere that stores the actual files.
Great if your graphics/assets pipeline or whatever stores the files somewhere, and your codebase uses those assets.
Not great as the primary system to replace google/microsoft drive.

Might as well just have/use something that stores the actual files.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
35 points (97.3% liked)

digitalescapetools

249 readers
14 users here now

A hub for discovering and sharing privacy-respecting, open-source, and self-hosted digital tools that improve productivity, creativity, and digital independence.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS