327
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by criss_cross@lemmy.world to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works

More Blind Lunacy.

This place has got some serious right wing nut job vibes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

I actually like that idea. Provided the law is ensured to have been read and the juries remain anonymous. Maybe multiple batches with no way of knowing who will be assigned to judge what law?

Ill definitely have to read more about that, thanks for telling me.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I don't think this system was meant to be perfect. It's just more resistance to bribes, coercion, and having you're values twisted by establishment political relationships.

Corporate lobbying groups would still exist, but they would be forced to make their case in the open, in front of the jury, not while kicking back some drinks or a wink and a nudge along with a campaign check. Also, not all lobbying groups are evil. To name a few, the EFF, ACLU, and FFR all have lobbying aspects their orgs. This would level the playing field between the good ones and the ones with deep corporate pockets.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
327 points (96.8% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

7186 readers
200 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS