726
submitted 15 hours ago by Mandarbmax@r1b.it to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

in a space as saturated as crypto, attention is the minimum to get in the door. And after that, if you keep gaining attention until the whole world knows your name, then it doesn't matter if 80% hate you, the other 20% will be giving you enough money to monopolize the market. Then you can enshittify and the hate doesn't matter (see Facebook, Google, Microsoft, etc).

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

You're skipping a lot of what made those companies happen.

Google was actually good once. They had a clean, usable website in an era of pop-ups and overused animated GIFS. Also, their search actually worked. They also had a bunch of cool programs and tools that they've since killed.

Facebook was also sort of good. But not really. Most of that was a sort of first mover advantage. Myspace existed, but didn't catch on, and then Facebook comes along, and it has a bunch of free games (that steal all your data). Since Facebook was most people's first social media, and their family's first social media, they get locked in.

Bill Gates' Mom was on the board of directors at IBM and forced the company to use her son's OS.

[-] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

first mover advantage

That's basically what I'm referring to here. Facebook wasn't the first social media platform but they were the first to capture enough users to monopolize the space. Yes all these companies had technical innovations too, but if you dig into Polymarket you can probably find some too. All of that doesn't matter if you can't get enough attention to reach critical mass though.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
726 points (96.4% liked)

Funny

16544 readers
992 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS